Monday, May 4, 2009

SNOWBOARDING IS FUN. WATERBOARDING IS NOT. RICE IS AN IDIOT AND WE HAVE A BIG MOUTH!

It appears to be open season on Condoleesa Rice, first from a college kid and now from a fourth grader who are challenging her stance on waterboarding and torture. Click HERE to read the story.

I often wonder, aside from our obsessive need to know everything about everyone, especially the dirty little secrets, whether we would not be better knowing nothing about what our intelligence operatives do.

Which is better, having an assassination program designed to oust those leaders that pose a global security threat, and no one knows anything, or sending thousands of troops in to fight a war that will, no matter the presentation, be considered controversial, costly and not usually victorious?  

Gone are the days that military might alone achieves anything. There are too many whackos, terrorists and extremists out there for us to combat traditionally. It would make more sense to have a covert operation that goes in to do the dirty work, using intelligence and years of infiltration to blend in until called upon to awaken and act.

Isn't that the same premise that terrorist sleeper cells use?  Johnny Barrot next door to you, the perfect neighbor, quiet, polite, no parties until one day you see him on the news as Yusaf Barsoum or some such name having been a part of a sleeper cell of terrorists called into action.

The thing is we are very loud and noisy. Before we do anything we are sure to broadcast it everywhere possible. It goes something like this.... "America will be launching a massive military strike somewhere in the middle east, sometime in the next week. For national security reasons, we cannot tell you exactly where or when, but at least ten infantry divisions, four tank divisions and five aircraft carriers will be involved." 

Why do we do this? Why do our local police announce they will be putting up a DUI checkpoint? Do they think you will want to stop by? Isn't the dui2goal to get as many DUI drivers as possible, and not the ones too drunk to remember that you broadcast the location a few hours earlier?

America is criticized for everything it does. In my opinion that is because we announce everything we are doing. We have endless experts talking up a storm about what we are doing. We ask the average idiot on the street their opinion about what we are doing even though most cannot name the people in office running the country and could not identify Iraq on a map even eight years later. Why are we talking about it? Just do it. Go do the deed and don't even talk about it then. That news report would be...

"Unidentified forces bombed the crap out of XYZ city today killing one hundred terrorists who did not know they were coming. "

We used to have a strong contingent of spies. Reportedly we used to conduct political assassinations. Who knew? It never made the news and the assassins were never on the cover of People magazine. There was a strength to the mystique of what America could do if you were foolish enough to piss off America. The Japanese learned that after Pearl Harbor. And yet, even after dropping two atomic bombs with repercussions that still affect the descendents of the atomic bomb survivors, America was regarded as a strong country, a decent country fighting for truth and justice and that all too famous "American Way."

Today we are regarded as buffoons, blundering into countries to play policeman and screwing it up, whether by one president proclaiming victory in the second week, when victory was still not apparent eight years later, or by the sheer casualty numbers created by the action that I have to wonder could not have been achieved by covert spies taking out the one guy we really, really wanted. Certainly we would have had a chance of finding the hole in the countryside he lives in a lot easier.

So whether waterboarding is legal or not, it is torture. The real question is whether we need to discuss the torture we do in order to protect our country, or not.

The true question is whether all the horrible things we would like to pretend we do not do, get done away from society, but people who are trained to do that and do it well.

Because if we are to cry out on moral grounds about the inhumanity we do to others in the name of freedom then we'll be standing in a very long line that covers the details of corruption, pollution, big corporations screwing the public, testing products on the general populace, why education involves no actual learning, why we work harder and longer and earn less, and my favorite, why we are all turning into sheep because we do not understand the complexities of law, disclaimers and are unable to identify truth anymore even if it smacks us in the face because we have no time to think, no will to try and decipher the microprint, and no way to really discern who is bullshitting us. 

In other words, we should have no moral authority to proclaim anything in the name of freedom, righteousness, Jesus or any other appellation to which you wish to ascribe. We're just not qualified as a nation.

Condoleesa Rice is an idiot. A college student and a fourth grader demonstrated that quite easily. But who is the bigger idiot? The idiot or the fools who followed that idiot's leader?

MisterWriter 

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

I vote for you Misterwriter. You are the biggest idiot!

Anonymous said...

Your blog was once really great (school district info, etc), but the political posts are really beginning to turn me off. Sorry.

MisterWriter said...

Anons, in my opinion, the blog postings in the past about the school district were hardly worthy of anything more than stirring the pot to effect change. I would not call that "really great." Now there are education postings, items of interest, politics, science and so on. This is what I wish to post. This is what I find interesting. And even if you disagree with the politics of it (which by the way is not a partisan affair - both sides of the political spectrum act stupidly on many occasions and will get nailed for it) why not use the comment box to insert your views rather than tell me how you don't like the blog. And if you can't muster up something to say, remember that no one has you chained here - you are free to leave at any time.

Anonymous said...

MisterWriter:

I served in the military during the Vietnam War, and the Cold War. Later, I worked for several different government "alphabet agencies." The need for information, aka intelligence, is constant and obvious (to most people, anyway).

Many of my colleagues, both military and civilian, left government service. Some of them were RIFed, thanks to Clinton, who downsized everything to (in some cases) near-ineffectiveness. We all know how that turned out.

Many have left more recently because they know that they can no longer do their jobs, due to the media, the Congress, and the current administration. To serve in intelligence positions is a huge risk, and the risk from our own government is now even greater than that from foreign entities. If I had not retired earlier, I would be quitting now.

I anticipate that for all intelligence agencies, recruitment and retention are going to become nearly impossible, and quite soon.

MisterWriter said...

Well said, 12:17pm. First, thank you for serving in the military and for your service. One of my other gripes is how unappreciative we make our military feel after they have given themselves to defend the liberties we all take for granted. That's a whole other topic.

Your points about the climate for personnel is true. Ultimately I do believe, if it is not already happening, that most ops would have to become clandestine in order to have any effectiveness. With idiot reporters and cell phone video cameras recording everything, even taken out of context for the situation, it violates effectiveness and serves no benefit to those at the front.
Thanks for taking the time to post a comment.

Gary Eberhart said...

The beauty of having a blog is that you can write what you want. Clearly you challenge us all to think about issues, such a novel idea. I use to feel very good about being very involved in Democratic politics, but then I began to think. I still favor many Democratic ideals, but given that I now think, and I am actually involved in having to deal with the policies of our State and our Nation, I am much more critical of the Democratic party and the Republican party.

I have a lot of faith in our Country and that faith that I have rests with the people, not the politicians. I have faith that we will turn this nation around once we as a society become either desperate enough or exasperated enough.

If you are going to sit in front of your computer and write about things that do not make us think and do not make us examine our community and the world around us, do us all a favor and spend your time writing a novel.

To coin the words of a recently dethroned politician, largely due to your blogging, "to my way of thinking, you are doing excellent work".

Keep up the good work Mister Writer.

MisterWriter said...

Thank you Gary. I am wary of a label like Republican or Democrat, or even Independent. Too often these labels are used as masks, and really they are designed for people who do not wish to get into the depth of issues to accept a stance from one of three points of view. The Republicans have screwed things up as much as the Democrats. I like to think that I have some conservative values but I'll be damned if I want my name mentioned in the same sentence as some Republicans. Ditto for the Dems. There are good Republican folk and good Democrats. There is no absolute salvation or absolute evil. Isn't that the founding fathers' objective in establishing a balanced system where we all can speak!

Whatever your formal affiliation, the change is within the individual who dares to speak. The worth is in the one who dares to make changes. And our survival may well depend on one of those two stances.