These days you almost need a college degree to determine whether something is true, partly true (or true under certain conditions), or whether it is a fabrication, a distortion or an outright lie.
The problem is that we are inundated with what claims to be the truth in everything we see and hear, of which only a small percentage actually could be called true.
Like the fallacy of being slightly pregnant or partly dead; there is the truth or there is a lie, but not really anything that qualifies between the two.
By removing the vague layers of half-truths, misleading statements implied to be true and veiled comments; one finds that the starkness of a black or white answer goes against the grain of everything we are taught in our society.
No longer can something be black or white; rather the focus is on the shades of gray that lie in-between. Diversity, professionalism, psychiatry, experts, government and so on. The list is endless.
You watch a medical product advertised on television and the portrayal is of a fine product designed to cure some ailment and bring joy back into your otherwise closed life. The disclaimers at the end suggest that the joy may come at a price; like Aladdin's three wishes, there is no such thing as a free lunch.
But how do we know what is true? How do we know what is truly right? How do we know what is right from simply righteous? The answer is that there is no easy answer. Certainly a trip to the book store and the rows of "How to" books written by reported "experts" in the field suggest that there is an answer when really there is only a suggestion.
The truth is that there is no such thing as an expert; only an expert in a given subjective situation at that moment in time, which is why fifty year old answers no longer work and why 2000 year old prophecies should be subject to question.
And yet we are barraged by experts. On television you have experts deciding that it is safe for little children to watch Chaz Bono on Dancing With The Stars. The notion that a transgendered person might be harmful to the psyche of little children is as absurd as the notion that we need to know the sexual condition and sexual behavior of every person. And as absurd as that may be, California will be revising the history textbooks to include the contributions of gays, lesbians, bi-sexual and transgendered people to history. Huh? Did they sleep with someone to cause an impact? How does ones gender actually warrant a special place in the annals of history?
The truth is that it is the victors in wars that write history. The losers are usually dead or exiled; history is really a one-sided retelling of a tale rather than being necessarily objective, much like newspaper reporting.
All religious groups swear to be telling you the truth. Many affirm their belief in the truth of their faith. By itself that is fine, however when their truth is forced upon your truth the contradiction is a conflict and since no one is right we settle for incorporating everything. Acceptance. Compromise. Perhaps the Bible needs to be rewritten (again) in order to include the GLBT contributions throughout? I somehow doubt that one would work, even in California.
I spend a lot of time looking at the truth. Often the truth is in front of your face, yet colored by the layers through which it has passed. Like photographs of models on the covers of magazines that look nothing like the skin blemished, ashen faced, anorexic figures who attribute beauty as a truth. Aging has a way of destroying that illusion no matter what some aging actor/actress tells you about their secret product. I know that the mirror does not lie unless you have a few drinks first. And facelifts are just awful.
As a society we like our lies, especially the ones we wrap in the flag of truth. Watching the GOP/Tea Party debates and the extreme range of truths from people within the same party makes you realize that no one person really holds the key to the truth and yet all believe they do.
Phone solicitors, ads on television, junk mail, stories written about poor people, starving children, faithful servants of God are all equally suspect because of the pollution of the value that was once considered important enough to hold as a gold standard. You were only as good as your word, but nowadays they coined a phrase to justify that value; plausible deniability - realistic and justified untruths.
When I meet people I try to gauge their level of honesty. If you want to be my friend it is easy; be true to your word and act accordingly. I know that to my friends I try hard to always do so. I am not a fan of the bleach whitened, gregariously charming person who issues flattery as a sign of friendship, reiterates it constantly reminding me of how valued I am, or what a dear friend I am only to do nothing else, say nothing else, initiate nothing else and remain elusively vacant. In other words acting the part rather than living the part. And as much as I do not consider myself a sucker by any standard, I have encountered more than a few people that I have had to filter out. It is disappointing.
I often wonder why, when only a third of the world believes in the Christian God, we require an oath upon a Bible in a court of law. Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
Well, that depends what truth you are talking about, doesn't it.